Recently began to focus on the process engine , also concerned about the jBPM, and saw a Ronghao article :
http://www.infoq.com/cn/articles/rh-jbpm5-activiti5 " Throughout jBPM: from jBPM3 to jBPM5 and Activiti5"
feel very good article , but because things just contact in this regard , and some confusion, but also want to have heroes , the question is as follows:
1, if jBPM4, then follow the jBPM5 JBOSS technical direction of change , then the subsequent development problems stand out ;
2, if Activiti5, no idea is mature , do not know if there is a follow-up development of power , including Alfresco company's situation did not quite know , at least not so famous JBOSS .
3, article behind the replies seem to think : Using jBPM or Activiti should go in-depth understanding and research to good use . So they need to better use to pay much effort ( workload mishandled ) to study it ? If you are a small team ( less than 10 ) , I can handle it then ?
------ Solution ---------------------------------------- ----
process engine BPM3-BPM4 a few changes on the great all process parameters of the PVM are presented with object database activiti heard , workflow or BPM better with it now used also more jpdl plugin is also very mature
------ Solution ------------------------ --------------------
I only used jbpm.
this with more people , a problem that everyone is good analysis ...
Moreover, the small number of your team , we recommend using the well-known product development projects , so that the risks and costs will be reduced a lot .
------ Solution ------------------------------------ --------
subsequent development is inevitable because it is not going to change the subsequent development of the use of existing technology to know that everything will be the last technology is always in development
------ Solution ---------------------------------------- ----
dig Ha found have not used
soy sauce drifting
------ Solution ------------------------------ --------------
just read the essay you are connected in Bowen JBPM5 use drools rules engine to manage the process is actually good thing rule engine processes inherently do not BPM4 user , I just use it
------ Solution ----------------------- BPM5 ---------------------
said JBPM3 is the best
------ Solution --------- -----------------------------------
jbpm read a little ,
---- - Solution --------------------------------------------
still feel more attention under the jbpm, jbpm is now applied more
------ For reference only -------------------------- -------------
a side note :
jBPM5 and Activiti are from the jBPM4 developed out of , jBPM5 is of JBOSS , Activiti is the original jBPM project leader to leave JBOSS ( likely due to technical road dispute ) , the company launched in Alfresco .
------ For reference only -------------------------------------- -
there , jBPM5 with Activiti also have a choice between a problem , that is the question which route to go .
------ For reference only -------------------------------------- -
------ For reference only ---------------------------------- -----
------ For reference only ---------------------------------- -----
we recommend are good, but far from sufficient to explain the problem ah. It seems that some really difficult questions , you really want to spend some time doing the research.
I go in quest up and down !
------ For reference only -------------------------------------- -
did not fully comply with the contents of the reply problem , knot stickers.
------ For reference only -------------------------------------- -
landlord , and finally what the election ? Even the same confusion, but also would like to ask !
------ For reference only -------------------------------------- -
same question ah ~ leadership to see the workflow of the East, is now confused !
------ For reference only -------------------------------------- -
who jbpm5 detailed documentation ah , do not understand this , especially yes. jbpm document the various label usage will not
------ For reference only ----------------------------- ----------
buddy you are wrong , jbpm5 after almost completely overturned jbpm4 out out a , activiti truly developed by the jbpm4 the
--- --- For reference only ---------------------------------------
watched point of their documents , feeling activiti5 go easy integration into spring in
没有评论:
发表评论